Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios 300 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Up to 38% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios 300 - £799.0 vs £1279.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Acer Predator Helios 300 - £12.11 vs £13.19 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios 300 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 47% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS TUF - 97 vs 66 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
66
68.04123711340206%
Value, £/FPS
£12.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1867 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.19/FPS
91.81197877179682%
Price, £
£1279
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1867 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
89.23976608187134%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
89.62264150943398%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios 300 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10870H | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 4 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
