Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 135% better in Battlefield 1 than ASUS TUF - 216 vs 92 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Up to 68% cheaper than ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits - £799.0 vs £2499.98
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits - £8.68 vs £11.57 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
216
100%
Value, £/FPS
£11.57/FPS
75.02160760587726%
Price, £
£2499.98
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2391 minutes ago
FPS
92
42.592592592592595%
Value, £/FPS
£8.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
57.2972972972973%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
39.502976960911205%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31st, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-10870H |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
