Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 FX506HE-HN386W on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 8100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS TUF F15 FX506HE-HN386W - 82 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS TUF F15 FX506HE-HN386W - £30.49 vs £729.99 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE-HN386W Laptop
- Up to 71% cheaper than ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits - £729.99 vs £2499.98
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
82
100%
Value, £/FPS
£30.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2499.98
29%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2339 minutes ago
FPS
1
1.2195121951219512%
Value, £/FPS
£729.99/FPS
4.176769544788284%
Price, £
£729.99
100%
Buy for £729.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
31.74174174174175%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
17.512296142894122%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 G634JZR 16.0" WQXGA 240Hz 500nits Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE-HN386W Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31st, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
