Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Laptop
- Performs up to 123% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF - 96 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS TUF - £9.91 vs £18.58 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop
- Up to 16% cheaper than ASUS - £799.0 vs £951.49
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Feb 14th, 2023 • 17th Variation
FPS
96
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£951.49
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £951.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
FPS
43
44.79166666666667%
Value, £/FPS
£18.58/FPS
53.336921420882675%
Price, £
£799
100%
Buy for £799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Feb 14th, 2023 • 17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 14th, 2023 • 17th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
84.12698412698411%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
84.12348401323042%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 14th, 2023 • 17th Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2388
100%
Multi-Core
11190
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core i7-10870H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |