Key Differences
In short — Alienware M16 outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Alienware M16 is 61 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of Alienware M16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 90 vs 86 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mar 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 1st, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
Alienware M16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
