Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA outperforms HP Victus 15.6" on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 16% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than HP Victus 15.6" - 78 vs 67 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
FPS
78
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
Sep 15th, 2024
FPS
67
86%
Value, £/FPS
£12.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£869.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
Sep 15th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
Sep 15th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
96%
Multi-Core
12037
100%
Sep 15th, 2024
Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2352
100%
Multi-Core
11123
92%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Victus 15.6" Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Sep 15th, 2024 |
Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |