Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch outperforms the cheaper Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 56% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch - £1499.00 vs £3399.00
- Up to 28% better value when playing God of War than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch - £17.85 vs £24.63 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 64% better in God of War than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 - 138 vs 84 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
84
61%
Value, £/FPS
£17.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1499
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6687 minutes ago
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£24.63/FPS
72%
Price, £
£3399
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6688 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
47%
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 10th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 inch Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2024 |
Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |