Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 outperforms the cheaper MSI Crosshair 16 Inch QHD+ 240Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Crosshair 16 Inch QHD+ 240Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 12% better in Dishonored 2 than MSI Crosshair 16 Inch QHD+ 240Hz - 126 vs 112 FPS
Advantages of MSI Crosshair 16 Inch QHD+ 240Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 23% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 - £1147.82 vs £1499.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 - £10.25 vs £11.90 per FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£11.9/FPS
86%
Price, £
£1499
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6635 minutes ago
Jun 1st, 2024
FPS
112
89%
Value, £/FPS
£10.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1147.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,147.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6636 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jun 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
Jun 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jun 1st, 2024
Core i7-14700HX
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2519
100%
Multi-Core
13478
100%
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Crosshair 16 Inch QHD+ 240Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2024 |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-14700HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
