Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 outperforms acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - 28 vs 23 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
23
82%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
28
100%
Value, £/FPS
£39.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 541 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2434
100%
Multi-Core
13285
100%
acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-14650HX |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 16" |
