Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- is 123 days newer than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8 Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 119 vs 113 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
119
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
86%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8 Gaming- Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
