Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Helios 300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 72% better in Overwatch 2 than Acer Predator Helios 300 - 215 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios 300 - £1499.00 vs £1778.00
- Up to 51% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Acer Predator Helios 300 - £6.97 vs £14.22 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
1st Variation
FPS
125
58%
Value, £/FPS
£14.22/FPS
49%
Price, £
£1778
84%
Buy for £1,778 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8865 minutes ago
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.97/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8862 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
70%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
79%
Multi-Core
7887
69%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
