Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios 16 outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Helios 16 is 366 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 175 vs 167 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
FPS
175
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2023 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
Acer Predator Helios 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |