Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Key Differences

In short — Thunderobot Zero 16 i9 RTX 4070 outperforms ACEMAGIC 16.1“ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.

Advantages of Thunderobot Zero 16 i9 RTX 4070 Gaming Laptop

  • Performs up to 548% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than ACEMAGIC 16.1“ - 149 vs 23 FPS
Calculator background
This is a free version of Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest


FPS

23

15%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £


FPS

149

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

FPS Winner

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance

Full GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Logo
Radeon Vega 8

System-Shared | System-Shared

Pixel Fillrate

16 GPixel/s

20%

Texel Fillrate

64 GTexel/s

26%


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Logo
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

81.36 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

244.1 GTexel/s

100%

GPU Winner

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison
ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop Image

ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop

vs
Thunderobot Zero 16 i9 RTX 4070 Gaming Laptop Image

Thunderobot Zero 16 i9 RTX 4070 Gaming Laptop

UnknownUnknown
Ryzen 7 5700UCore i9-13900
Radeon Vega 8GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
16 GB
32 GB
512 GB SSD1 TB SSD
1920x10801920x1080
60 Hz
240 Hz
15.6"16"

Popular ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop and Thunderobot Zero 16 i9 RTX 4070 Gaming Laptop Comparisons

Compare 2 Laptops in Games

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.