Key Differences
In short — Ace Predator Helios-16 outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Ace Predator Helios-16 is 36 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of Ace Predator Helios-16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 34% better in Battlefield V than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 224 vs 167 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 26th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 26th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 26th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 26th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
Ace Predator Helios-16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Mar 26th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |