Key Differences
In short — 3XS Aperta 17.3" outperforms the cheaper ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZX 16" WUXGA 165Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZX 16" WUXGA 165Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of 3XS Aperta 17.3" Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZX 16" WUXGA 165Hz - 106 vs 80 FPS
Advantages of ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZX 16" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 38% cheaper than 3XS Aperta 17.3" - £1935.18 vs £3099.96
- Up to 17% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than 3XS Aperta 17.3" - £24.19 vs £29.24 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
106
100%
Value, £/FPS
£29.24/FPS
82%
Price, £
£3099.96
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for £3,099.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 355 minutes ago
FPS
80
75%
Value, £/FPS
£24.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1935.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £1,935.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
292.3 GTexel/s
56%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
3XS Aperta 17.3" Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZX 16" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2022 |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i9-12900 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
