The Radeon RX 6950 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 240 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £1402.27 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 97% cheaper – £39.95 vs £1442.22
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 30 vs 335 Watts
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R7 240 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, £
£1442.22
2%
Value, £/FPS
£8.48/FPS
11%
Buy on Amazon
£1,442.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,304.54
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,300.00
In Stock
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
24%
Min 1% FPS
16
15%
Price, £
£39.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R7 240 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R7 240 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R7 240 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
2%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6950 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $1,099.00 | MSRP | $69.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 335 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
576 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
295.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.6 GPixel/s |
739.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 14 GTexel/s |
23.65 TFLOPS | FP32 | 448 GFLOPS |
