The Radeon RX 6400 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's £25.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 53 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 14% cheaper – £149.99 vs £175.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
£175.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£217.12
In Stock
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, £
£149.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.05/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
50%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
50%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
67%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
$159.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
53 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 128 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
74.27 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 111.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 3.565 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
