The Radeon RX 5700 XT is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a better value for money, as it's only £133.48 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 18% cheaper – £618.12 vs £751.60
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 120 vs 225 Watts
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, £
£751.6
82%
Value, £/FPS
£7.22/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
80%
Min 1% FPS
44
76%
Price, £
£618.12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
97%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
70%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
56%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
225 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
121.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
304.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
9.754 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |