The Radeon RX 560 XT is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
The Radeon RX 6600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 132 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 6600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
67%
Min 1% FPS
31
60%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Average FPS
95
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, £
£263.25
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.77/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 6600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 6600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 6600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
49%
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.928 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 13th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
Polaris | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 132 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 159.4 GPixel/s |
137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 279 GTexel/s |
4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.928 TFLOPS |