The Radeon R9 Nano is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
The GeForce RTX 2070 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
71%
Min 1% FPS
37
65%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Average FPS
101
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, £
£1567.16
100%
Value, £/FPS
£15.51/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
62%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
103.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
233.3 GTexel/s
91%
FP32
7.465 TFLOPS
91%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2018 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.7 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 233.3 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.465 TFLOPS |
