The Radeon R9 M385X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M385X
The Radeon RX 6600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 6600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M385X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
46
48%
Min 1% FPS
19
37%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Average FPS
95
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, £
£263.25
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.77/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 6600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 6600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon RX 6600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M385X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
34%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.928 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M385X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 13th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 132 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 76.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 279 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.928 TFLOPS |
