The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's £436.13 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 6650 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 51% cheaper – £419.00 vs £855.13
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 176 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
63%
Min 1% FPS
33
55%
Price, £
£855.13
48%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
31%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, £
£419
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.91/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£419.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£412.49
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
47%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
73%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |
