The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's £705.14 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 590 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 82% cheaper – £149.99 vs £855.13
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 175 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
92%
Min 1% FPS
33
89%
Price, £
£855.13
17%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
16%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, £
£149.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.05/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
72%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
72%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
