Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R9 290 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3481 days newer than Radeon R9 290.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 111% better in Alan Wake 2 than Radeon R9 290 - 74 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 165 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 16 vs 4 GB
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
74
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£480.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £480.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7029 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R9 290 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$399 | MSRP | $499 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |