The Radeon R9 290 is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 75 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
98%
Min 1% FPS
31
97%
Price, £
£319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.98/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£319.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£209.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£195.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£367.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£495.84
In Stock
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
88%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
62%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
