The Radeon R9 290 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 75 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
85%
Min 1% FPS
25
78%
Price, £
£190.11
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.45/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£190.11
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£212.42
In Stock
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
73%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
44%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
