The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5600 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5600 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 150 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
63%
Min 1% FPS
27
54%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5600 XT
Jan 21st, 2020
Average FPS
92
100%
Min 1% FPS
50
100%
Price, £
£687.6
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.47/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
61%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
46%
Radeon RX 5600 XT
Jan 21st, 2020
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
99.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
224.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.188 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 21st, 2020 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| 102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 224.6 GTexel/s |
| 3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.188 TFLOPS |
