The Radeon R9 270X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 180 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
31%
Min 1% FPS
23
23%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
102
100%
Price, £
£541.14
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£541.14
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,243.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£752.57
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,101.83
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,540.42
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
12%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 720 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS |
