The Radeon R7 M260X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 M260X
The Radeon Pro W5700 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 M260X
Dec 6th, 2015
Average FPS
39
40%
Min 1% FPS
15
28%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, £
£332.22
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.39/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 M260X
Dec 6th, 2015
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
64 GB/s
14%
Pixel Fillrate
5.72 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
17.16 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
549.1 GFLOPS
6%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 M260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 6th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 17.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 549.1 GFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
