The Radeon R7 360 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 360
The GeForce GTX 1650 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 75 vs 100 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 360
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
48
75%
Min 1% FPS
21
68%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, £
£319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.98/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£319.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£209.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£195.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£367.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£495.84
In Stock
Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 360
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
16.8 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
50.4 GTexel/s
54%
FP32
1.613 TFLOPS
54%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 360 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
16.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
50.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
1.613 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |