The Radeon R7 265 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 265
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 150 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Average FPS
48
30%
Min 1% FPS
21
21%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, £
£1565.5
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.66/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
8%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
1.894 TFLOPS
5%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 265 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
59.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
1.894 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |