The Radeon R7 265 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 265
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 100 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Average FPS
48
67%
Min 1% FPS
21
57%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
93%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
43%
FP32
1.894 TFLOPS
43%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 265 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
| 59.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
| 1.894 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |
