In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R7 265 is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 265
No clear advantages
GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 1800% faster in Battlefield 6 – 19 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 1800% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Feb 13, 2014
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
19 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
14 FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 265
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
1.894 TFLOPS
63%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
71%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 265 Feb 13th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
