The Radeon R7 260X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 115 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
70%
Min 1% FPS
21
60%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
41%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
30%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $139.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
