Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R7 260X - 53 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 75 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
53
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$139 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |