The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 56. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 30 vs 210 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 56
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
48%
Min 1% FPS
16
35%
Price, £
£35.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Radeon RX Vega 56
Aug 14th, 2017
Average FPS
86
100%
Min 1% FPS
46
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX Vega 56
Aug 14th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
409.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.54 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 14th, 2017 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 210 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 94.14 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 329.5 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 10.54 TFLOPS |
