Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3509 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of Radeon R7 240
- Up to 81% better value when playing Deathloop than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - £0.80 vs £4.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 30 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 158% better in Deathloop than Radeon R7 240 - 116 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 16 vs 2 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £35.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7301 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.14/FPS
19%
Price, £
£480.12
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for £480.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7300 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 240 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$69 | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |