The Radeon R5 240 OEM is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 50 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
24%
Min 1% FPS
15
14%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, £
£749.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.41/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£749.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,442.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,304.54
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,300.00
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
3%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
