Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 652 days older than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than GeForce GTX 1650 - 217 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 75 vs 230 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
88%
Value, £/FPS
£1.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
24%
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$1599 | MSRP | $149 |
6x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1500 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
945 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |