The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
68%
Min 1% FPS
20
59%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Average FPS
69
100%
Min 1% FPS
34
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
29%
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
82.03 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
136.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.375 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 19th, 2016 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 82.03 GPixel/s |
| 39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 136.7 GTexel/s |
| 1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.375 TFLOPS |
