Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 222 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Performs up to 23% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 37 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
37
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£212.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £212.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
58%
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$149 | MSRP | $139 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1291 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1392 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |