The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
82%
Min 1% FPS
18
72%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, £
£212.42
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.86/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£212.42
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£185.25
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
44%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
58%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| 39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| 1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
