Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon PRO W7600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 77 days older than Radeon PRO W7600.
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7600
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 26% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Radeon PRO W7600 - 92 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 16 vs 8 GB
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
92
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£480.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £480.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7253 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
91%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon PRO W7600 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$599 | MSRP | $499 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2440 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |