The Radeon Pro W6800 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only £2170.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6800
- Up to 48% cheaper – £2319.00 vs £4489.00
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 250 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro W6800 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W6800
Jun 8th, 2021
Average FPS
142
59%
Min 1% FPS
85
51%
Price, £
£2319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£16.33/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, £
£4489
51%
Value, £/FPS
£18.54/FPS
88%
Buy on Amazon
£4,489.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£3,789.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£4,989.00
In Stock
Radeon Pro W6800 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W6800 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W6800 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W6800
Jun 8th, 2021
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
17.82 TFLOPS
17%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W6800 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| $2,249.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
250 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 32 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 222.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 556.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 17.82 TFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
