The Radeon Pro W5700 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 75 vs 205 Watts
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, £
£332.22
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.39/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
53%
Min 1% FPS
23
43%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
30%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 205 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
