Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro W5500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W5500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 353 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro W5500.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W5500
- Up to 12% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £351.86 vs £399.99
- Up to 0% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - £4.63 vs £4.65 per FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro W5500 - 86 vs 76 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5500 - 120 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £351.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 623 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
86
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399.99
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 622 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
96%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro W5500 | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1744 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1855 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |