The Radeon Pro Duo is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 225 vs 350 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro Duo
Apr 26th, 2016
Average FPS
74
71%
Min 1% FPS
38
66%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, £
£798.14
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.67/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro Duo
Apr 26th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
84%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
84%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro Duo | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 26th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Radeon Pro GCN | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 350 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
