The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 35 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
72%
Min 1% FPS
21
64%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
36%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
