The Radeon 760M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 15 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
34%
Min 1% FPS
26
25%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
102
100%
Price, £
£541.14
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£541.14
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,184.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£752.57
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,101.83
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,549.01
In Stock
Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
23%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | Navi II |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 720 GTexel/s |
| 5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS |
