The Radeon 760M is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 15 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
88%
Min 1% FPS
26
84%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, £
£175
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.73/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£175.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£217.12
In Stock
Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
75%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | Navi II |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.27 GPixel/s |
| 83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.4 GTexel/s |
5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.565 TFLOPS |
