Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is 2625 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Performs up to 29% better in Death Stranding than Radeon R9 280 - 94 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 75 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
64%
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 30 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
712 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1057 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |